This was the letter sent before the final hearing in the finacial matters.

The Judge was Justice Coleridge.

 

 

PAUL WARREN.

397, Soi 38,

PATTANAKAN ROAD, SUAN LUANG,

BANGKOK 10250.

THAILAND.

Fax 00 662 7194833.

Home Phone 00 662 7194833.

Email [email protected]

 

My service address is

C/O Dr Michael Pelling.

 

 

 

No:  FD 01 F00877  

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

 

FAMILY DIVISION

 

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION UNDER

PART III OF THE MATRIMONIAL AND FAMILY

PROCEEDINGS ACT 1984

 

B E T W E E N:

SOMYONG WARREN

         Applicant

and

 

PAUL MELBOURNE WARREN

                       

    Respondent

 

 

Your Honour.

                       I sincerely apologise for my absence to your hearing on the 28/06/02.

I hope to explain and understand to the reasons why I have not appeared.

 

I hope that you will understand the reason for the action I took in October last year and the same in February this year.

 

I also hope that you understand and support, the reasoning to my recommendations, of what is to be done with the remaining assets in the UK.

 

I will show by factual documentation that throughout both proceedings the child proceedings and this final hearing on ancillary relief.

There has been committed by Mrs Warren, but also to my great surprise by a Solicitor, (Miller Sands solicitors) a great deal of perjury to the RCJ, contempt of court by both to the RCJ, lies, innuendo, fraud, to a great many Government agencies.

And most of all a complete disregard to the best interests of my 7 year old daughter Natalie.

Who was abducted from Thailand her habitual home and her father.

But despite this I have been pillared in UK hearings, based on very little factual provable evidence, perjury, and fraud by Mrs Warren and Miller Sands.

 

 

My reasoning for perjury and contempt.

Both Mrs Warren and Millers Sands brought both proceedings into the Uk jurisdiction due to perjured sworn statements to the RCJ.

 

 

Those hearings were instituted in Thailand, Place of marriage, Place of divorce, and Place of abduction, which Mrs Warren didn’t wish to attend due to Mrs Warrens misconduct under Thai Law.

 

(i)                 The main reason for these hearings was Ms. R. Dixon’s (solicitor) of Miller Sands Sworn Statement that they didn’t know until the last minute of the Thai final hearing.

           And Mrs Warrens Main Statement to the same.

I think now with my complaint to Justice Black, over this perjured Sworn Statement and the factual documentation I produced, this was shown as just plain and simple perjury to the RCJ by Ms Dixon of Miller Sands and Mrs Warren.

I would ask that special regard be taken to the letter to Justice Black.

 

I will show that dates were shown, that proceedings were started, court hearing numbers produced, place of the hearing produced well in advance of the stated date of the Thai hearing on the 15/02/01.

In letters from my then Solicitor Ms. S. Lewis in September 2000, November 2000, January 12th 2001, Mrs Warrens own Bundle in the child matters shows this.

A letter stamped by Miller Sands received, to the letter from Ms Lewis of the 12th January 2001 stating the date of the final hearing accompanied with my Thai lawyers copy of the same from the Thai Courts.

Backed up by factual documented proof.

PW 1 Letter to Justice Black.

PW2    Letter Ms S Lewis to Miller Sands 17th November.

Stating court number and court.

PW3.    Ms. Lewis’s letter 12th January stamped received by Miller Sands stating date of final hearing in Thailand.

MS Dixon’s sworn statement of 26/03/02 to the hearing 14th May 2002 item 3.

 I have shown in the above evidence that everybody did know, day number of hearing place of hearing in fact the same day I received it, well in advance this is perjury by Ms R. Dixon.

(Even in this sworn statement they have the date wrong after some 16 months after the event.)

 

(ii)               The Sworn Statement by Mrs Warren that I never Supported my

            daughter in Thailand was perjury.

            In Mrs Warren’s 2nd statement in the child Matters, produced

            at a later Stage 23/11/01.

            Once the proceedings were entered into the Uk arena and they

            had achieved this by this omission of this fact in the first

            statement.

            By Mrs Warren and Miller Sands that yes I did support.

            Mrs Warren finally admitted in her 2nd statement I did give

            Support on 25th December 1999, (albeit we don’t agree on the

            Sum given) but shows I did support in December 1999.

            I could not support further due to the abduction of my

            daughter from Thailand in January 2000 some 20 days later, to

            where I didn’t know.

            Until late July 2000, from July 2000 until the first hearing was

            impossible due to High legal costs being incurred in the UK

            and Thailand, as per my Sworn Statement, phone bills to the

            UK as per my Sworn Statement.

            Backed up by factual documented proof Mrs Warrens own

            Statements.

            Please read Mrs Warren second Sworn statement please

            note the date 23/11/01 in the Child matters Case Statement

            Supplied which differs from the statement of 29/09/01in this

            omission.

            That now these hearings had entered the UK legal System

            partly due to this.

            It was stated I did Support. (Albeit only for one month Due to

            the abduction of my daughter)

            So finally we see there I supplied good housing, support,

            Schooling fees paid for the coming year paid for, no debts for

            Mrs Warren, from the country of abduction.

                

(iii)             The 1st Sworn statement of Mrs Warren in the child matters stating, that the British Embassy assisted and advised in the abduction and the removal of my daughter to the UK is Perjury.

           Mrs Warren was destitute the reason for abduction and

           advise given by the British Embassy now shown via replies to

           first questionnaire that Mrs Warren had £3000.00 this is

           perjury.

           E-mails produced at all hearings now also e-mail from the

           Lord Chancellor’s office that again Mrs Warren has shown to

           perjure herself to the RCJ.

           It has also shown that Mrs Warren gained a British government

           document (passport) by FRAUD.

           Yet another criminal offence committed by Mrs Warren.  

           Mrs Warren’s own admission in her Sworn Statements 2 to

           Support given and having well over £3000.00 in the joint

           account in Thailand as per 1st questionnaire, to which she held

           the account book and illegally remove, as it was a 2-signature

           account.

           Backed up by factual documented proof.

           Mrs Warrens both statements in child matters.

          

           PW 4 E-Mail from British Embassy

           PW 5.E-Mail from lord Chancellors Office

           PW6 Mrs Warrens Statement in the Child matters statement 1

           and 2.

           ITEM 6.

           PW 7 Mrs Warrens replies to my first

           Questionnaire item 4.

 

 

 

(iv)             Miller Sands deliberate concealment of hearings is contempt of court, and perverting the course of justice they have tampered with a court order and yet presented it as the true order of the court.

           Backed up by factual documented proof.

           Justice Blacks Hearing.

           Exhibits PW1 letter to justice Black who have my documented

           Proof on file with Justice Black.

 

 

(v)               Miller Sands failed attempts to prevent me attending hearings was against my human rights.

Backed up by factual documented proof.

Exhibit PW 8 LETTER FROM Ms Lewis to Miller Sands dated 17/01/02.

 

(vi)             Miller Sands deliberate attempt of concealment to the last minute on the Thai property, has made this difficult to impossible in the time frame they gave to recover information.

           Due to Thai law this is a difficult and complex area to get

           Information unless you have the correct documentation.

           WHICH TO THIS DAY I HAVE NEVER RECEIVED.

           I have been asking since October 2000 for this information,

           In June 2001 I had a point blank refusal from Miller Sands to

           discuss this, again in January this year via E-Mail.   

           Justice Hales in the hearing also requested this information on

           the 14/10/01.

           In May this year I have received only part of this information,

           that has given me one month with only part of the information.

           It is impossible with out co-operation of the other party, part

           of the land is missing.

           (The Royal Thai courts understood the complexity of this

            Problem and dealt with it accordingly.) 

            Backed up by factual documented proof.

            My questionnaire’s also shows this.

            PW 2 letter from Ms Lewis to Miller Sands.

            PW 9 Letter dated 5/07/01from Miller Sands to Ms Lewis

           refusing to give further information on Thai property pargraft

           PW 10. Emails From Miller Sands to myself dated 25/01/02

 

(vii)           Mrs Warrens Sworn statement of 26/3/02 again is perjury

           Item3, 5.

           

 

My concerns to what has gone on in the Uk and Thailand.

 

      That a British court overturned another counties rulings even though

      many laws were broken by Mrs Warren in that initial country

      Thailand.

      Surly this looks as though the British legal system is condoning the

      breaking of other countries laws and sets a president for the future.

 

      Now we have many laws broken in the UK and international

      laws by both Mrs Warren and Miller Sands and still there

      is no recourse.

      Mrs Warrens And Miller Sands Perjury and contempt of the British

      legal system and Thai legal system.

      That has never been redressed once in the British hearings.

 

       I understood it is a criminal act to commit perjury before the High

      Court, I understood it was a criminal offence to commit fraud too.

       But nothing has ever happened to resolve these crimes.

      Also the acceptance by British courts to accept perjured evidence

      over factual documented evidence, has not only shocked and

      surprised me but also inhibited my rights to a fair hearing ECHR

      Article’s 1 and 6.   

     

     

     

 

 

   Thailand.

 

       Before December 1993.

       As is shown by the Thai documents I produced to the LSC in June

        2001.

       This document now proves the rumours that before my marriage to

       Mrs Warren, she borrowed a great deal of money from Bangkok

       Bank PLC loaned against the house, Could not repay.

       So found a European husband Me, deserted her then common law

       husband and two children, leaving him with the large debt and two

       children to care for, but unable to regain ownership of the house as

       Mrs Warren kept hold of the house book he only paid the interest, as

       there was little point in paying the loan off for a wife who had

       deserted both him and their children.

       (At least this time Mrs Warren didn’t desert the child, but abducted

        instead to use as a bargaining tool)

 

 

       I understand that his business failed in the recession of 97, 98 so

       could no longer afford to even pay the interest.

       So in late 1997 Bangkok Bank PLC started to take repossession

       action.

       In January 1998 I paid off the large loan £ 11,800.00, Mrs Warren

       Then once the house was financially secure ordered her ex husband

       out of the house.

       The children left with their father.

       Factual Proof provided as per the Thai government print out of the

       House book none from Mrs Warren.

  Now backed up by factual documented proof.

  PW 11 Shows Mrs Warrens loans on the house in Thailand from

  local gov’t house book.

  PW 12 My bank statement January 1998 showing the money sent to

 clear the loan before repossession took place.

 

 

 

That we only came on holiday.

      I think a bit of common sense needs to prevail here.

      As per my statement you do not pack all your belongings, sell your

      Business, cars, and move 7000 miles for a holiday.

      You do not rent your house out for 5 yrs for a holiday.

      You do not go to Mrs Warrens own Embassy in London With Mrs

      Warren her language her Embassy.

      Apply for a non-immigrant (o) visa; both have to go for interviews 1

      Per Month a total of 4 interviews here until you are granted a 1 year

      visa at great expense and time plus £4000.00 in a Thai bank joint

      bank account all Thai Immigration Law. (That again shows there was

      a joint account)

      When you can get a 3-month tourist visa by post, nip over the

      Border here and renew the 3-month tourist visa at very little cost.

 

      I have proof of all the above including the container packing list, sale

      of business.

      All entries to my passport and immigration stamps ample factual

      Proof provide but none from Mrs Warren.

Backed up by factual documented proof.

PW 13.  Stamps to my passport.

PW 14   Container booking.

 

      Thai Bank account.

      The empting of the joint account here by Mrs Warren in January
       2000,
       All joint accounts must have two signatures to withdraw, what lies
       were told to change this.

       This also comes under the marriage laws of Sin-Som-Ros.

       As Mrs Warren had the only Bank book, I have never received a

       copy of the account number even after requests to produce this

       number.

       But as I need a joint account with £4000 in it to get my visa Thai law

       this must prove this as factual.

       Please read my second questionnaire.

       An illegal act in Thailand.

 

 

Thai Marriage divorce.

 

Housing in Thailand.

 

 That I vacated on the 17th December 1999 to ensure my wife and

 daughter lived in; I ensured was debt free good accommodation with

 support given on the 25th December, 20 days before the abduction of

 my daughter, has never been taken into account by the UK courts, it

 was in the Thai courts.

 Backed up by factual documented Proof.

 Mrs Warrens Statement My Statement.

  

The settlement.

 

As I never claimed my share for any of the land or house I paid for

here, which I was entitled to do under the Thai Family law of Sin-

Som-Ros but didn’t. This was accepted by the Thai courts as

settlement but it seems not in the UK court different laws, different culture.

Backed up by factual documented proof.

PW 15 Letter from My Thai lawyer.

From Mrs Warrens own Bundle her Thai Lawyer.

 

                  

      Support.

 

      Mrs Warren has to apply to the Thai courts for this and

      still can, as all the above Mrs Warren can appeal to the Thai

      Courts Thai Law.

      But due to Mrs Warrens Misdemeanours with Thai law will not.

      Surly Mrs Warren should exhaust her options in Thailand first.

      Before abducting my daughter then applying to a UK court to over

      turn another countries rulings that the abduction took place into

      account.

     

     

 

       Land and property Thailand.

 

       First we had denials due to Mrs Warren obtaining council housing

       and Legal aid benefits illegally.

       Then June I was told By Miller Sands it was sold to either to brother

       or cousin in January 2000.

       Depends which afidavite or statement in both hearings of Mrs

       Warrens you read who bought the house.

       Only for myself to find out that in fact it was gifted to my daughter in

       October 2000.

       But with Mrs Warren as parental controller as to what can be done

       With the property all illegally done Thai law of Sin-Som-Ros.

  Backed up by factual documented Proof.

  From Mrs Warrens own bundle of many statements and affidavits.

  From my only one statement and this letter.

  PW 16 My print out from local Thai Gov’t with English translation 

 

 

        If Mrs Warren had concerns over her children what about the

       children from the pervious marriage that she deserted and left

       destitute.

       They are in a poor financial status now, why wasn’t it gifted jointly

       to her other 2 children also, who lived there for many years and

       regarded it as their home and their father paid for the home please

       read my statement.

 

 

 

      

      We now have the valuation from a company called AREA that I am

      taking to task over at this very time, please read my letter to them.

      I can also pay a company to give me the figures I want to hear, and I

      don’t use British taxpayers money to do it.

      I have been asking for documentation on the Thai property since

      October 2000.

      My Thai Lawyer disputes this valuation, my bank manager disputes

      this, I dispute the valuation.

      As an example they quote Gov’t valuation 476,000 Thai baht.

      As the gov’t valuation is done on Item 6 of PW16 that shows the

      figure in my statement to be correct and Area’s 100% wrong.

      We have a totally different figure even on there own Thai gov’t

      documents they presented to Miller Sands of PW16

       PW16 Thai & English translation.

       PW17   My letter to area the valuation agent.

       PW 18 My 2ndquestionnaire.

 

      I have been ignored, told lies, and in June 2001 openly refused to

      Correspond on the Thai property again in January 2002 was refused

      by Miller Sands.

      Again Miller Sands giving me very little time to check these out.

      Which due to Thai law are complex matters and distance to travel to

      get part of the information.

 Backed up by factual documented proof.

 As Per the above and PW 9.

 

 

      We have a letter that didn’t come from Mrs Warren’s brother and

      unknow to him, but in fact came from his wife.

      Also there is no proof of this money only the letter, like the British

      nobody keeps that sort of money lying around, £5000 is a lot of

      money in Thailand.

      It had to come from a bank account again no proof, please for once

      lets have some proof.

      I can get my cousin to write he loaned me money.

      I wouldn’t, as I could not prove it.

      Please read my both my questionnaires also the letter.

 

      PW 19 Letter purported to come from Mrs Warren’s brother but he

      has denied knowing any knowledge of this.

     

      Mrs Warrens Sworn statement that I removed all the furniture when

      in fact, it is now shown via Mrs Warrens questionnaire replies again

      not true. 

      Where the rest and my families heirlooms destined for Natalie, my

      personal possessions!

      Mrs Warren still hasn’t answered this.

      Backed up by factual documented proof.

      Please read Mrs Warrens first Statement in Child Matters item 5 that

      states I emptied the house.

      First statement in the child matters supplied.

      PW 20 Mrs Warrens packing list via questionnaire 1

 

     My Income.

 

      I have given my income for 1999,2000,2001, confirmed by the then Uk

      Agent as true and accurate in my statements.

      Income to date is Debt of approx £ 2900 in advertising clients one

      £800.00 from my now UK agent.

      Backed up by factual documented proof.

      Copy of my debt and earnings this year.

      Marked hobby publishing.

      Debt of £2929.39 off set by

     1 client £800.00

     Reducing the Total Debt £2129.39

    

 

      Local market two visa applications = £ 800.00 no proof of this I’m

      sorry.

 

      Mrs Warren and Miller Sands came up with a spurious rounding up

      of figures totally false a no proof to back their figures up but seems

      to have been accepted by the UK courts rather than factual

      evidence.

      PW 21 My statement of accounts 1999,2000,

      PW 22 UK agent’s confirmation.

      PW 23 My statement of accounts 2001

      PW 23 Again confirmation.

      I have never denied that I worked in Thailand illegally (No work

      Permit).

      Due to Miller Sands en-trapment policy via e-mails from several

      people phone calls to something I have never denied.

      Now fear of being reported to the authorities and advise from my

      Thai lawyer and Thai immigration dept, I have removed myself from

      The Thai company that I belonged to effectively now I’m

      Unemployed and now a househusband.

      A fake brochure was produced by Miller Sands please read my

      Questionnaire 2.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

      PW 24 two E-mails from a Miss Viriyanansin, that my then Solicitor

      Ms Lewis replied to the last E-mail and never got a reply but was in

      Mrs Warrens bundle.

      E-mail from a Mike B never replied.

      PW 25 Lies told of E-mails from C Black he supplied a fake

      Brochure Etc.

     

     

 

       The UK.

     Please read my Statement and CHRONOLOGY backed up with hard

        factual evidence documented.

   

 

      Mrs Warren.

       Has lied and committed perjury and fraud constantly over land,

       property, support, car, money, my daughter.

      To the RCJ, LSC, Cambridge housing authority, benefit agencies,

       British Embassy and finally myself.

 

      February 2000.

      Mrs Warren tried to empty the UK bank account.

      Letters from Barclays prove this also in my statement.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

      To be supplied By Ms Lewis

 

      July 2000

      Mrs Warren some how gained access to the frozen bank account

      Over drew it again well documented and in my statement withdrew

      Was £1,180.00.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

      To be supplied by Ms Lewis

 

      The Car

      Mrs Warren states she only had from January 2000 to March

      2000 in my questionnaire 1 of April 2002.

      Again confirmed by other sources and witnesses factual statements

      and evidence.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

 

      August 2000

      E-mail from C Black Mrs Warren bought a £4000.00 car. (On legal aid

      Benefits, part time job!)

      PW 26

 

       September 2000

       E-mail from tappy stating Mrs Warren has a car and working and

       living in Cambridge in a council house will visit them soon.

       PW 27

 

       November 2000.

       Two eyewitnesses that swear Mrs Warren stated to them.

       That Mrs Warren was the owner of the small white car she was

       driving at the time they saw both Mrs Warren and the small white

       car.

       Sworn statements can be got if required.

       March 2001         

       A photo sent to me in March 2001 that shows Natalie in front of a

       Small white car, which the photo is, date marked Feb 01 by the

       Camera.

       PW 28 Copy of the Stamp and Photo, photo retained by myself as I

       have very few of my daughter.

       PW 7 replies to my first questionnaire item 3.

 

       And this was bought while Mrs Warren was claiming to be destitute

       on legal aid, benefits.

       And Mrs Warren was claiming she could not afford to travel to

       Thailand for the hearing in February 2001 when she could afford to
       run a car?

       

 

 

       October 2000

        E-mail from a person called KEV acting for Mrs Warren demanding

       All in Thailand and 75% of UK property as per my statement and e-

        Mail.

        Supplied in my statement.

        All backed up by factual documented proof.

        PW 30

 

       June 27th 2001

        PW 31 Letter from Miller Sands Mrs Warren sold her house in

        January 2000 this time to her cousin.

        And Ms Lewis reply.

       Only for me to find out Mrs Warren gifted the house to my daughter,

        As per above.

 

        I have had in various statements, Letters From Miller Sands and

        Mrs Warren the house was bought by the brother then by the

        Cousin.

        The same applies to who loaned the so called £5000.00 was it the

         brother or the cousin depends on what statement and which

         hearings you read?

        Just what is the TRUTH? As I found out the house wasn’t sold to

        brother or cousin at all MYSELF after being told it was sold once to

       the cousin them Mrs Warrens brother.

      

              

 

       February 2002.

       The none event of two contact of the 9th and 10th of February orders

       being broken within 23 hrs of being given by Justice Bennett due to

       PAS Inducement by Mrs Warren.

      

 

      

 

 

 

        MILLER SANDS (solicitors)

        I have seen my daughters and my human rights trampled into the

        ground by Messer’s Miller Sands who have just about breeched

        every ECHR article from 1,6,8,13,14,17. Committed perjury on a

        number of occasions, lied to various government agencies.

   Backed up by factual documented proof as above.

  

 

(1)    July 10th 2000 A Letter from Miller Sands to my solicitor Ms Lewis,

       stating they acted for Mrs Warren nothing of my daughter.

       (It can now be seen via Mrs Warrens and Miller Sands Statement,

       that they had been acting for Mrs Warren for 3 to 4 months before,

      so in were in fact withholding knowledge of an abducted child)

      This letter only arrived after Mrs Warren some how accessed a

      Frozen UK bank account.

          An instant reply was dispatched via Ms Lewis because of health

          Concerns to both Mrs Warren and my daughter also the general

          well being of my daughter.

          It took approximately 12 weeks numerous letters phone calls only

          To get the vague reply YOUR DAUGHTER IS IN GOOD HEATH AND

          AT SCHOOL IN CAMBRIDGE no more than that.

          All documented true and factual as per my statement and

          Chronology.

          All backed up by factual documented proof.

           Mrs Warren’s 2nd statement in child matters.

           PW 32 Ms Lewis to Miller Sands letter 12/07/00

           PW 33 Miller Sands reply dated 29/09/00

       

 

 

(2)   Refusal to give information on my daughter well being schooling.

         All backed up by factual documented proof.

        To be supplied by Ms Lewis

       

 

(3)   Requested the school to refuse to reply to my solicitor or me I found the school my daughter attended.

         As per Mrs Warren and Miller Sands statements in child matters

    

(4)    Refusal to pass on Christmas presents to my daughter, as Miller Sands were the only address I had.

         All backed up by factual documented proof.

         PW 35 fax to Miller Sands

          

 

(5)    Long protracted effort to get LSC certificate number in December

      2000 to April 20001 again in November 2001 to march 2002.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

      To be supplied by Ms Lewis

 

(6)    Refusal to give full financial discloser.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

      As above

 

(7)    Refusal by letter from Miller Sands to talk or correspond on Mrs Warren’s assets in Thailand.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

      AS above

 

(8)    Gave false information to local housing officer and other local

      Government offices stating that I had two properties in the UK.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

      PW 36 letter to Miller sands from Ms S. Cole (that shows not only

      did I have problems with truth and getting replies from Mrs Warren

      and Miller Sands) letter from Miller Sands to Ms.S. Cole Cambridge

      housing Authority dated 3/8/01.

      Also my 2nd questionnaire

 

(9)    Gave false information to the land registry stating my divorce in

       Thailand was a fake.   

       All backed up by factual documented proof.

       To supplied By Ms Lewis

 

(10)  Gave false information that I harassed various Government

           Agencies to do as I wished.

           All backed up by factual documented proof.

 

           PW 37 letters from various agencies that show a different.

 

 

 

(11)   Gained access to a private e-mail from myself to the school in

        question.

        All backed up by factual documented proof.

 

        PW 38 The E-mail and letter to LEA.

        Mrs Warren Miller Sands Statements in the Child Matters they had

         this E-mail in their bundle.

 

(12)   Of a Solicitor who either orchestrates or is a willing participant in

   the removal of any knowledge from my daughter’s memory of her

        father.

(13)  In all probity gained access to private and confidential e-mails

        between my solicitor and myself.

       PW 39 letter from Ms Lewis to Miller Sands.

 

       

 

(14)  Of a solicitor that produced a fake brochure purported to be from

        Suminya enterprises.

        Denied by US, C. Black, S.Flowers had a phone conversation with

        Ms Lewis, stating his concern also, as it was his wife on the

        Cover of the fake.

        This was a fake production of the cover S. Flower’s Brochure and

         The Insides C Blacks brochure but using the name Suminya

        Enterprise.

         I believe Miller Sands stated that Mr C Black gave this Brochure

         in one statement or correspondence.

        As you can see from E-Mails I have produced that he has denied

        this Statement of Miller Sands and Stated he only gave Miller

        Sands HIS brochure.

        Please read my 2nd questionnaire

        PW 40. Fake and real Patty’s introductions Brochure.

 

 

 

 

      My misdemeanours.

      I walked out of a marriage that hasn’t worked for six years.

      But remained in the marriage for as long as I could for Natalie’s

      Sake.

      But before I did I ensured the welfare of both Mrs Warren and

      Natalie my daughter by supplying a house that was debt free and

      support in Thailand.

      All backed up by factual documented proof.

 

       In august 2001 I sold my house finally sold in October 2001, I had

       no choice Financially but to remove £ 40,000 to safe guard my  

       position here and house myself.

       All done totally legally all documentation open and honest.

       All backed up by factual documented proof.

 

      In February this year I removed a further £50,000 after a lot of soul

      searching and still does give me a problem, to the point that I now

      have 14 stitches two damaged tendons in my right wrist.

      Yes can show and prove this also.

      There were NO court orders in force at the time.

      The only misdemeanour breaking my promise to an untruthful

      Solicitor.

 

 

 Why did I remove the money after giving Miller Sands my promise.

 

My promise to Miller Sands would have stood, but after being at the hands of a solicitor that is quiet willing to perjure themselves in front of the RCJ a criminal act.

That lied, cheated, use innuendo, dirty tricks, and this was accepted in all other hearings and is still using the same methods to this very day as pre my complaint to Justice Black.

That either orchestrated or at the very least condoned the PAS inducement of my daughter.

I can only say it was the same as making a promise with the devil

himself.

 

Your honour as you can see by the sheer weight of documented proof that I have shown of the character of Mrs Warren also of the Deeds of Miller Sands.

Mrs Warren And Miller Sands have only for the best part provide, hear say, innuendo, lies and worst of all perjury, Very little documented proof to back things up.

There has been a great deal of Misconduct by Mrs Warren not only in Thailand but also to the Royal court of Justice England.

As I do hold very grave concerns that my daughter will lose out to Mrs Warrens sheer greed and vindictiveness.

Today I have had a call from CAFCASS over my contact with Natalie; there is a report due shortly.

I believe this report will show Mrs Warren in a rather bad light, that there is unfair pressure being brought on my Daughter by Mrs Warren to refuse contact with her father.

That Mrs Warren is inducing PAS into Natalie.

I do have good first hand knowledge of PAS, as I was a victim myself.

.

It was seen on the non-event after only 23 hours of Justice Bennett’s 2 contact orders in February this year.

That Mrs Warren abducted Natalie with a fraudulently obtained Passport.

 

 

I sincerely hope you will go along with my thoughts as to disposal of the remains assets in the UK.

 

 

 

Mrs Warren was given financial settlement I.E. house and land totally debt free in Thailand under Thai Law.

 

I would ask that all remaining assets in the UK  £25,000 be invested and held on trust by trustees for the benefit of Natalie, the interest or other yield to be paid out to Mrs Warren as maintenance for Natalie, and the capital to revert to Natalie at the age of 21.

 

 

I have also ensured Natalie has an equal share in any profits or property in Thailand now and in the future, with my now wife’s (Mrs Suminya Warren), 9 year old son and if other children that come along in the marriage.

 

My now wife (Mrs Suminya Warren) will have control of this until she is deceased then shared equally amongst the children of both our marriages.

As you will see unlike Mrs Warren who deserted her two children and now left them destitute, I do understand responsibilities to other children from other marriages and do ensure that all are cared for.

 I sincerely wish that you go along with my thoughts on this settlement    for the sake and future of my daughter.

 

Dated June 18th 2002.                                  Signed P.M.Warren.

 

Mr Rose of the Lord Chancellors office never has replied to this E-mail also a chase up mail